Prediction of Tatia Mikadze vs Xiao Zhou Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Mikadze vs X. Zhou

Tatia Mikadze

GEO

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

281

Best Rank

524

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.0K

Career Money

Plays

Xiao Zhou

CHN

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

281

Best Rank

524

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.0K

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mikadze 0 - 1 Zhou

They have played 3 sets in total, with Tatia Mikadze winning 1 and Xiao Zhou winning 2. The last match between Xiao Zhou and Tatia Mikadze was at the Fuzhou, 05-07-2010, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Xiao Zhou getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mikadze	0
Zhou	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) Fuzhou(07-05-10)

Stats

Xiao Zhou

Tatia Mikadze

T. Mikadze vs X. Zhou H2H Profile

T. Mikadze	Stats	X. Zhou
$2,950	Career Prize Money	$0
62.60% (77-46)	Career Total W/L	59.32% (35-24)
0	Hard	1
3	Titles	0
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Mikadze vs X. Zhou Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tatia Mikadze has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Xiao Zhou has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tatia Mikadze, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Xiao Zhou has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tatia Mikadze has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Xiao Zhou has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tatia Mikadze has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Xiao Zhou winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tatia Mikadze has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 55/22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/5). Xiao Zhou has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 9/3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Tatia Mikadze has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Xiao Zhou has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tatia Mikadze winning 0 times and Xiao Zhou being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tatia Mikadze winning 1 and Xiao Zhou winning 2.
The last match between Tatia Mikadze and Xiao Zhou was at the Fuzhou, 05-07-2010, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Xiao Zhou getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tatia Mikadze has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Xiao Zhou has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tatia Mikadze has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Xiao Zhou has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tatia Mikadze has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Xiao Zhou has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tatia Mikadze vs Xiao Zhou Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Mikadze vs X. Zhou H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Mikadze	Stats	X. Zhou
0	H2H Matches Won	1
1	Sets Won	2
10	Games Won	16
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Mikadze Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W15 Tbilisi - 17-05-2021
Q1 Alana TuayevaA. Tuayeva	L	6-4 2-0 ret.	Stats
Batumi - 11-09-2017
R1 Nina StojanovicN. Stojanovic	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Q3 Daria KruzhkovaD. Kruzhkova	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
Q1 Anna KadagidzeA. Kadagidze	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Telavi - 10-07-2017
SF Ekaterine GorgodzeE. Gorgodze	L	6-4 6-1	Stats

View All

X. Zhou Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Beijing - 08-07-2013
Q3 Fangzhou LiuF. Liu	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Q1 Chang LiuC. Liu	W	6-7(1) 6-3 6-1	Stats
R2 Sheng-Nan SunS. Sun	W	6-2 2-6 6-1	Stats
Q2 Kai-Lin ZhangK. Zhang	W	6-7(3) 6-4 6-1	Stats
QF Saisai ZhengS. Zheng	L	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Mikadze vs X. Zhou Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Mikadze	Stats	X. Zhou
62.60% (77/46)	YTD Win/Loss	59.32% (35/24)
61.65% (172/107)	Sets Win/Loss	55.56% (75/60)
55.03% (1363/1114)	Games Win/Loss	52.44% (646/586)
51.35% (19/18)	Hard Win/Loss	56.52% (26/20)
71.43% (55/22)	Clay Win/Loss	75.00% (9/3)
33.33% (3/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0.01	Aces Per Game	0
12	Aces Total	0
0.02	Double Faults Per Game	0
23	Total Double Faults	0
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
552.84	Average Opponent Rank	614.64
62% (542/872)	1st Serve %	0% (0/0)
58% (314/542)	1st Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
47% (156/330)	2nd Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
59% (55/93)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/0)
49% (377/774)	Return Points Win %	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (2/2)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
57.58% (38/28)	Challenger W/L	56.82% (25/19)
71.15% (37/15)	Futures W/L	71.43% (10/4)
62% (75/121)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (34/58)
59% (10/17)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (5/10)
43% (15/35)	Deciding Set Win %	67% (12/18)
88% (77/68)	1st Set Won, Won Match	94% (32/30)
12% (77/9)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	6% (32/2)
17% (46/8)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (27/4)